UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER
National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP):
We have further heard for some time Mr.Gonsalves, learned senior counsel, and Mr.Raju
Ramachandran, learned Additional Solicitor General. The various schemes for the poorer sections of the citizens of this country
have been the subject matter of the orders passed by this Court from time to time. It seems that some States have discontinued
some of the schemes. As an interim measure, till the matter is fully heard in detail, we direct that no scheme covered by
the orders made by this Court including the National Old Age Pension Scheme, National Family Benefit Scheme, in particular
Annapurna, and National Maternity Benefit Scheme shall be discontinued or restricted in any way without the prior approval
of this Court. In other words, it means that till further orders, the schemes would continue to operate and benefit all those
who are covered by the schemes. We hope that the Government of India and the State Governments would simplify the procedure
so that high proportion of eligible persons remain to be covered by the schemes.
A copy of this order shall be sent to the Chief Secretaries of every State Government/Union
Territory. The Union of India, through the concerned Ministry, shall also issue directives to the State Governments/Union
Territories to comply with this order.
ICDS (Integrated Child Development Scheme):
In respect of Integrated Child Development Scheme, directions were issued on 28th November,
2001. It seems that most of those who are covered by the said order are not getting benefit under the said scheme. We have
heard the submissions of Mr. Gonsalves and perused the report submitted by the Commissioners and the directions sought. From
the facts and figures that have been furnished to us, it seems evident that there is a large number of mal-nourished children
between the age group of 0 to 6 years. These figures are based on the survey conducted under the National Family Benefit Health
Scheme. The position is quite alarming. These young children are the future of the nation. Further, it appears that except
Kerala and Tamil Nadu where the benefit under the scheme is said to be reaching to about 50 per cent of the children, in the
rest of the country the average seems to be below 25 per cent. The position in the States of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand
and Uttaranchal seems to be quite alarming. According to the survey for the period 2002-2003 the access to supplementary nutrition
for the children in Bihar reaches about 12.6 per cent of those who are otherwise covered by the scheme. Mr. Raju Ramachandran,
learned ASG prays for a short adjournment to discuss the matter with the concerned officials and make submissions on the directions
that may be issued to ensure the compliance of the Order dated 28th November, 2001.
As prayed, the case is adjourned to 29th April, 2004. BPL (Below Poverty Line Scheme)
The case may be put up for hearing on a non-miscellaneous day after re-opening of the
Court after summer vacation.
(N. Annapurna)
Court Master
(S. Thapar)
PS to Registrar
V.P. Tyagi
Court Master